Redalyc.A review of non-native seaweeds from California, USA and Baja California, MexicoA review of non-native seaweeds from California, USA and Baja California, Mexico. Hidrobiológica Miller, Kathy Ann; Aguilar-Rosas, Luis Ernesto; Pedroche, Francisco F.vol. 21, núm. 3, 2011, pp. 365-379Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa Distrito Federal, MéxicoMiller, Kathy Ann; Aguilar-Rosas, Luis Ernesto; Pedroche, Francisco F.al209304657@correo.azx.uam.mx202019-01-18T20:06:00Z2019-01-18T20:06:00Z8126626964458016482142162015-03-24T00:00:00ZRedalyc2019-01-18T00:00:00ZHidrobiológica 2011, 21 (3): 365-379Introduced seaweeds in California and Baja California365A review of non-native seaweeds from California, USA and Baja California, Mexico Reseña de algas marinas no nativas de California, EUA y Baja California, MéxicoKathy Ann Miller,1 Luis Ernesto Aguilar-Rosas2 and Francisco F. Pedroche1,31University Herbarium, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building 2465, University of California, Berkeley, CA. 94720. USA.2Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Apdo. Postal453, Ensenada, Baja California, 22830. México3Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Lerma,Lerma de Villada, Estado de México, 52006. México. e-mail: kathyannmiller@berkeley.eduMiller K. A, L. E. Aguilar-Rosas and F. F. Pedroche. 2011. A review of non-native seaweeds from California, USA and Baja California, Mexico. Hidrobiológica 21(3): 365-379.ABSTRACTThe seaweed flora of California, USA and Baja California, Mexico is a world-class treasure. The magnificent diversity and abundance of seaweed populations reflect the dramatic sweep of these rich coastal environments and habitats, from the Pacific Northwest to the subtropics, including rocky shores and reefs, sandy beaches, and offshore islands. Novel species have joined the flora, mostly via unintentional introductions of non-indigenous species by humans. Most of the 29 non-native seaweed species recorded from this coast originated in Asia. Many have been “discovered” within the last 30 years. Although the vectors that bring these plants or their propagules to the California and Baja California coasts (international shipping and shellfish aquaculture) may or may not be increasing within that time span, the condi- tions for the establishment of non-native species seem to have improved. Climate change, including the frequency and severity of ENSO events, may be responsible for creating space, diminishing competition, and permitting the persis- tence and spread of non-native species. Here we review these non-native seaweed species and speculate on the link between their establishment and climate change.Key words: Non-native, seaweeds, molecular identification, vectors.RESUMENLa flora algal de California, EUA y Baja California, México representa un tesoro a nivel mundial. La espléndida di- versidad y abundancia de las poblaciones de algas marinas son una manifestación de la riqueza impresionante en ambientes y hábitats de esta línea de costa, del Pacífico noroeste a los subtrópicos, incluyendo costas rocosas, arre- cifes, playas arenosas e islas. Especies de reciente ingreso, no nativas, se han adicionado a esta flora regional, la mayoría por introducciones involuntarias por parte del ser humano. A la fecha, existen 29 especies de algas marinas con estas características para la costa mencionada. La mayoría originarias de Asia y muchas “descubiertas” en los últimos 30 años. Aunque los vectores que acarrean estos organismos, o sus propágulos, a las costas de California y Baja California (entre ellos el movimiento internacional de barcos o la acuicultura de moluscos y crustáceos) pueden o no haberse incrementado en este periodo de tiempo, las condiciones para el establecimiento de estas especies no nativas parecen haber mejorado. El cambio climático, que incluye la frecuencia y fuerza de los eventos ENSO, puede ser el responsable de crear espacios libres y disminuir la competencia, permitiendo la persistencia y promoviendo la dispersión de estas especies. En el presente trabajo, se hace un recuento de las algas marinas no nativas de California y Baja California y se especula su relación con el cambio climático.Palabras clave: Introducción, algas, identificación molecular, vectores.HidrobiológicaVol. 21 No. 3 • 2011 PAGE 366Miller K. A. et al. PAGE 367Introduced seaweeds in California and Baja CaliforniaINTRODUCTIONNon-native or exotic species, especially those that spread like weeds, are both familiar and newsworthy. Since the beginning of civilization, humans have moved plants and animals to serve them, either intentionally to provide food, shelter or companion- ship, or inadvertently, as hitchhikers. Many plant introductions in the terrestrial realm are familiar and well documented (Bossard et al., 2000). But the state of knowledge of non-native species in the marine realm is relatively recent because it is difficult to identify them, track their spread, and determine their impact on communi- ties and ecosystems.Non-native marine species. Non-native marine species are con- sidered a threat to biodiversity because of their potential to com- pete with native species and pre-empt their resources, to alter energy flow through communities, to facilitate the introduction of other non-native species, and to homogenize regional biotic diversity (McKinney & Lockwood, 1999; Grosholtz, 2005; Bulleri et al., 2008). For a non-native marine species to join a new com- munity, it must have a means of transport (vector), it must be able to survive in its new habitat, and it must establish a population through persistence and reproduction. It is clear that the vast increase in global shipping has provided numerous vectors for moving thousands of species from port to port via ballast water or hull fouling (Carlton & Geller, 1993; Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2007). Aquaculture, especially of shellfish, is another important source of intentional and unintentional introductions (Druehl, 1973; Mineur et al., 2007). The aquarium industry is responsible for the introduc- tion of Caulerpa taxifolia (M. Vahl) C. Agardh, and potentially other species, to temperate waters (Padilla & Williams, 2004; Zaleski & Murray, 2006). Some authors have attributed an increase in the frequency of introductions occurring at the end of the 20th century to an increase in global marine shipping (Carlton, 1996a, b; Cohen & Carlton, 1998). Others have disputed evidence for a change in introduction rate, recognizing that instead our discovery rate may be increasing (Costello & Solow, 2003; Wonham & Pachepsky, 2006). Some authors, however, have postulated, for marine and terrestrial systems, that global climate change may be driving in- troductions of non-native species and range expansions (Dukes & Mooney, 1999; Carleton, 2000; Sorte et al., 2010).Seaweed introductions. Seaweeds are the engineers of near- shore environments, providing primary production and habitat structure for intertidal and subtidal communities. Humans utilize more than 200 species as the basis of an international industry in food and phycocolloid products that has doubled since 1984 and was valued at U.S. $6.2 billion for 1994-5 (Zemke-White & Ohno, 1999). Due the ecological and economic importance of seaweeds, attention has turned to the introduction of non-native species and their impact on native communities (Williams & Smith, 2007; John- son & Chapman, 2007). Williams and Smith (2007) estimate that the global number of introduced species is 227, including 165 red al-gae (Rhodophyta), 66 brown algae (Phaeophyceae) and 45 green algae (Chlorophyta), and tally up 408 separate introductions. The Mediterranean Sea, with 85 introduced seaweeds, including 9 that are considered invasive, is a hot spot for introductions (Ri- bera-Siguan, 2002). At the Thau Lagoon, an aquaculture site on the southern coast of France, 45 species of seaweeds (23% of the flora) are exotics, probably introduced with the oyster Crassos­ traea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) from British Columbia, Canada and Japan (Verlaque, 2001).Seaweed diversity in the Californias. The magnificent diver- sity and abundance of seaweed populations along the coast of California, USA, and Baja California, Mexico, reflect the dramatic sweep of this rich coastal environment, embracing rocky shores and reefs, sandy beaches, and offshore islands. The cold Califor- nia Current, a branch of the Kuroshio Current, runs south along the coast, shifting offshore near Point Conception, where the coastline veers abruptly east. Northern California temperatures range from 9-16° C. In the southern California Bight, the warm Da- vidson Current flows northward in the late summer and autumn, bringing maximum temperatures of 20° C, but is depressed dur- ing spring and early summer months when upwelling brings cold deeper water to the surface at headlands throughout California and Baja California, Mexico (Dawson, 1951). The eight California Channel Islands, in the southern California Bight, are particularly interesting because they are relatively free of coastal develop- ment and lie in this hydrographically complex region of warm and cold currents. California and Baja California host the junction of two great biogeographic provinces: the cold temperate Oregonian Province roughly to the north of the northern Channel Islands and Point Conception, and the warm temperate to subtropical Pana- manian Province to the south. Thus, this coastline encompasses two worlds of species diversity.Our scientific knowledge of California and Baja California seaweeds began with the Malaspina’s 1791 expedition of dis- covery (Silva, 1996), grew through the long-distance taxonomic efforts of European and American botanists on the east coast, and came of age with the collected works of W.A. Setchell andN.L. Gardner at the University of California at Berkeley (Setchell & Gardner, 1903, 1920, 1925). More recently, G.M. Smith, W.R. Tay- lor, G.J. Hollenberg, I.A. Abbott and P.C. Silva have made inesti- mable contributions to our knowledge of the flora. E.Y. Dawson’s work in Baja California and the Gulf of California was singularly significant (Dawson, 1961, 1962). Yet the delineation of species within our most common genera poses daunting challenges to phycologists, who continue to pursue field, culture and molecular studies to unravel relationships at every taxonomic level (Brodie & Lewis, 2007).Marine Algae of California (Abbott & Hollenberg, 1976) lists 669 species of red, brown and green seaweeds. About 14% are endemic to California, 44% are restricted to the Pacific Coast of North America, 21% are restricted to southern California andadjacent Baja California and 21% are so-called “cosmopolitan” species, with global distributions, that were described from other parts of the world (Abbott & Hollenberg, 1976; Silva, 2004; Pedro- che et al., 2005, 2008). Because the native range of many of the species in this latter group is unknown, these species are known as “cryptogenic”, with hidden origins (Carlton, 1996a). Many may be ancient introductions. The ships that brought early explorers to our coasts (and eager gold miners in the 1840s) were wooden reefs supporting organisms from many ports visited over multi- year voyages, and were probably significant sources of introduc- tions, long before scientists established a baseline for what is indigenous (Carlton, 1979). Organisms from our coast may have been introduced to other oceans by the same mechanism. We also share genera and species with the western Pacific, espe- cially Japan and Korea (e.g., Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2004, 2006, 2007; Miller et al., 2007, 2009; Hughey et al., 2009; Kogishi et al., 2010). These require critical investigation to determine whether they are identical or sister species.When specimens from our coast were sent back to Euro- pean specialists, vague collection notes (“in mare australe”) and mistakes as simple as mislabeling were frequent, and have left a legacy of confusion. For example, it was recently discovered and confirmed with molecular data that the type locality (original col- lection) of a very common red seaweed known as Iridaea cordata (Turner) Bory de Saint-Vincent was the tip of South America, not Vancouver Island, Canada, the provenance written on the herbari- um sheet (Hommersand et al., 1993). That species name is therefore not applicable to our west coast species (now known as Mazza­ ella splendens [Setchell & Gardner] Fredericq, based on a Califor- nia type specimen described by Setchell and Gardner). Similarly, the southern California rockweed Hesperophycus californicusP.C. Silva was once known as H. harveyanus (Decaisne) Setchell & Gardner, based on a plant supposedly collected in Monterey in the 1830, but probably collected in France and not Hesperophycus at all (Silva, 1996). We must critically revisit nomenclatural his- tory as well as species identity because the basis of our know- ledge of seaweed distributions is cultural as well as biological.NON-NATIvE SPECIES Of ThE CAlIfORNIASWe consider organisms to be native when they occupy the area in which they evolved; usually there are natural barriers to the dis- persal of a species. Sometimes these barriers shift through habitat or climate changes, allowing a species to expand its geographic range. Sometimes we are able to access new areas via new tech- nologies, such as SCUBA or submersibles, and revise our records for the ranges of species. But to detect introduced species, we must rely upon the history of our taxonomic science and art to identify native species. Although some species are easily identi- fied, others represent a challenge to confirm their name. Molecular tools are increasingly important to distinguish identify introduced species and to identify source populations (Booth et al., 2007).To date, 27 non-native seaweed species have been reported from California, including 5 green (Chlorophyta), 7 brown (Pha- eophyta) and 15 red (Rhodophyta) species, and 11 species, 9 of them common to both areas, from the coast of Baja California, including 1 green, 6 brown and 5 red species (Table 1). Here we discuss the introduction history (if known) and the distribution of these introduced species.Inconspicuous, relatively rare introduced species. These spe- cies are tiny, often filamentous, and are easily overlooked. MostTable 1. Non-native seaweeds in the Californias (California, USA,1 and Baja California, Mexico2). See text for references.Chlorophyta (Green Algae)Bryopsis spp. (three undescribed species, San Francisco Bay)1Caulerpa taxifolia (M. Vahl) C. Agardh*1 Codium fragile subsp. fragile (Suringar) Hariot1 Ulva fasciata Delile2Phaeophyceae (Brown Algae) Ascophyllum nodosum (Linnaeus) Le Jolis1 Cutleria cylindrica Okamura1, 2Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh2Elachista nigra Takamatsu1Fucus spiralis Linnaeus1Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh1, 2 Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt1, 2 Scytosiphon gracilis Kogame2Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar1, 2Rhodophyta (Red Algae)Aglaothamnion tenuissimum (Bonnemaison) Feldmann-Mazoyer1Antithamnion nipponicum Yamada et Inagaki1Asparagopsis armata Harvey1Caulacanthus ustulatus (Mertens ex Turner) Kützing1, 2Ceramium kondoi Yendo1Dasya sessilis Yamada1Dasya sp. (Coyote Point, San Francisco Bay)1Gelidium vagum Okamura1Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss1, 2 Grateloupia lanceolata (Okamura) Kawaguchi1 Grateloupia turuturu Yamada1, 2Lomentaria hakodatensis Yendo1, 2Neosiphonia harveyi (J. Bailey) Kim, Choi, Guiry et Saunders1 Polysiphonia denudata (Dillwyn) Greville ex Harvey1 Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman1, 2* declared eradicated.have been reported only from a few localities. Their distribution in the Californias is unknown.Aglaothamnion tenuissimum (Bonnemaison) Feldmann- Mazoyer and Polysiphonia denudata (Dillwyn) Greville ex Harvey are both red filaments originating in England and detected in San Francisco Bay (Josselyn & West, 1985). Nothing is known about the mode or timing of these introductions. More recently, another red filamentous species, Neosiphonia harveyi (J. Bailey) Kim, Choi, Guiry & Saunders, once thought to be a native of the east coast of North America, has been traced through molecular methods as originating in Japan and spreading, via several introductions, to the Atlantic, including the British Isles, New Zealand, and U.S., including Monterey Bay, California, where it had been identified as Polysiphonia acuminata Gardner and in San Diego, as P. sim­ plex Hollenberg (McIvor et al., 2001). This species was reported a second time (Hughey et al., 2009), collected in Humboldt Bay on floating docks and pilings. Identification of the Humboldt sample was confirmed by analyzing a portion of the rbcL gene, which was identical to a specimen of N. harveyi from Akkeshi, Hokkaido, Ja- pan. Both the Humboldt and Akkeshi sequences contain a genetic marker that McIvor et al. (2001) defined as diagnostic for hap- logroup B. These data support a second, unrelated introduction of N. harveyi to California.Oyster culture is a likely vector for seaweed introductions (Mineur et al., 2007). The history of oyster farming in California has been reviewed by Barrett (1963). Since 1902, the Pacific oyster, C. gigas, was imported from various sites in Japan to oyster farms in Puget Sound, Washington. According to Galtsoff (1930), oysters from Akkeshi Bay were deemed the best adapted for transplant- ing to North America. However, the decision to exclude Pacific oysters from Humboldt Bay, the largest California bay available for oyster culture, delayed the state’s development of the indus- try. Importation of the Pacific oyster from Japan to Humboldt Bay was initiated in 1953, and in 1957-58, Pacific oyster seed were imported from Willapa Bay, Washington to Humboldt Bay. Large scale production of Pacific oysters in Humboldt Bay began in 1955 and has continued to be an important industry. Although it is clear that N. harveyi in Humboldt Bay originated in Japan (Hughey et al., 2009), the trajectory of the introduction is unknown. It may be primary (directly from Japan to California), secondary (from Japan to the east coast of the U.S. or to Washington, thence to California) or even tertiary, since oysters from San Francisco Bay were exported to Humboldt Bay (Barrett, 1963).Antithamnion nipponicum Yamada & Inagaki, a red filamen- tous species, was collected from Melpomene Cove, Isla Guadal- upe, Baja California, Mexico in 1949 and described as A. hubbsii Dawson (Dawson, 1962). This species has been collected in the USA from Santa Catalina Island and Dana Point, both in southern California (Young, 1981), and more recently from Half Moon Bay, central California, and North Carolina (Cho et al., 2005). It has alsobeen reported, as A. pectinatum (Montagne) J. Brauner, from Italy (Cho et al., 2005). Cho et al. (2005) suggest that this species be- came established in California, the Mediterranean and western Atlantic oceans via a recent introduction from Japan, possibly correlated with the introductions of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar and Codium fragile subsp. fragile (Suringar) Hariot (for- merly known as Codium fragile subsp. tomentosoides [van Goor]P.C. Silva).Asparagopsis armata Harvey, a red alga endemic to Aus- tralia and New Zealand, was introduced into the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean in the 1920s (Feldmann & Feldmann, 1942) and is now a conspicuous invasive species in North Atlantic Eu- rope (Dixon, 1964; Farnham, 1994). The minute filamentous diploid phase of this species was collected in 1972 in San Diego, CA, maintained in culture and identified as A. armata by analysis of chloroplast DNA RFLPs (Ní Chualáin et al., 2004). Ní Chualáin et al. (2004) speculate that the introduction from Australia is recent, and that there is a good possibility for the spread of this species north- ward, following the cool California Current. To date, this species (including the conspicuous haploid phase) has not been observed since the original collection.Ceramium kondoi Yendo, a red corticated filamentous spe- cies, is native to China, Japan, Korea and eastern Russia, but has also been collected in Alaska, Vancouver Island, Canada and Or- egon (Cho et al., 2002). In 1999, a single specimen was collected at Bodega Bay, California in northern California (Cho et al., 2002). In the eastern Pacific, this species occurs on docks and near oys- ter farms, suggesting that oyster mariculture is responsible for its spread (Cho et al., 2002).Elachista nigra Takamatsu is a small filamentous brown epiphyte on kelps, native to Japan. It was discovered on herbar- ium specimens of the kelp Eisenia arborea Areschoug from San Clemente Island, one of the southern California Channel Islands (Kitayama et al. 2005). This species, as E. orbicularis (Ohta) Skin- ner, has also been recorded as introduced to Australia; based on historical specimens of its host, this introduction took place after 1976 (Womersley, 1987).Introduced species with limited observations. These are species that may be large and conspicuous, but have been collected infre- quently, mostly at single sites.Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss is a red alga, native to Japan, that has been proved to be invasive in France, Spain, Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and Denmark (Rueness, 2005; Thomsen et al., 2007). An unidentified Gracilaria species from Elkhorn Slough, central California (Goff et al., 1994) and Es- tero from Punta Banda, Baja California (Bellorin et al., 2002, 2004) were identified as this species using sequences from nuclear SSU rDNA and ITS (Bellorin et al., 2002, 2004). Its distribution in California and Baja California is unknown, due to the difficulty ofdistinguishing Gracilaria species on this coast, but it is probably far more common than we realize. It has also been introduced to Virginia, on the east coast of the USA (Thomsen et al., 2006).Gelidium vagum Okamura is a red alga, native to Japan, China and Russia. It has a limited distribution in British Columbia, Canada (Renfew et al., 1989) and was collected in Tomales Bay, California in 1995 (Hughey et al., 1996). It has not been reported elsewhere. Because Tomales Bay is home to oyster mariculture, this species was probably introduced on oyster spat.The brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum (Linnaeus) Le Jolis, the knotted wrack native to the Atlantic Ocean where it is used to steam clams and lobsters or pack bait, rarely establishes in San Francisco Bay. Mats of A. nodosum have been sighted floating in the Bay on many occasions over the years, introduced as dis- carded packing material but with no evidence of establishment (Silva, 1979; Josselyn & West, 1985). In 2002, mats of Ascophyllum were observed in San Francisco Bay near Redwood City Marina (Miller et al., 2004). It appeared to have been living unattached for some time. Although these mats were removed in 2002, substan- tial mats of Ascophyllum was again found at Bay Farm Island in San Francisco Bay and removed in 2008 (P.C. Silva, personal com- munication). It is clear that this species is introduced again and again to the Bay, but thus far manages only to thrive locally. It is unlikely to become invasive itself, but it is a vector for non-native invertebrate species (Miller et al., 2004).Another rockweed species, the brown alga Fucus spiralis Linnaeus, has been collected from a population in Tomales Bay, northern California (Hughey et al., 1996). This species is also pres- ent on the coasts of Attu Island, Alaska, British Columbia, Canada and northern Washington, USA (Norris & Conway, 1975), where it is also likely to be an introduction from the Atlantic (Coyer et al., 2006, 2010). It has not been observed at any other locations in California or Baja California.Oyster mariculture may be implicated in the dispersal of the green alga Codium fragile subsp. fragile, more commonly known by the epithet Codium fragile subsp. tomentosoides, a species ad- ept at asexual reproduction. This invasive strain of Codium has spread from its native Japan to the northeast Atlantic (from the Netherlands to Spain), most of the Mediterranean, the northwest Atlantic (Nova Scotia, Canada to New England and North Caro- lina), New Zealand, Australia (Trowbridge, 1995, 1998), and to San Francisco and Tomales bays, California (Silva, 1979). Codium is a pest in New England, where it overgrows and dislodges shellfish (earning the name “oyster thief”) and, with an introduced bryo- zoan, has displaced native kelps (Levin et al., 2002). This invasive strain has not been reported from Baja California, and in Califor- nia, it is still rare, spreading slowly or remaining unrecognized, though the native Codium fragile subsp. californicum (J. Agardh)C.A. Maggs is well represented from Alaska to Baja California (Ab- bott & Hollenberg, 1976; Pedroche et al., 2002 as Codium fragile).In addition to the native green alga Bryopsis corticulans Setchell, three undetermined species in the genus Bryopsis, with different reproductive characteristics, are recorded from San Francisco Bay (Silva, 1979). One is entirely asexual, but little is known about these species beyond the original report. It is pos- sible that one of these species goes under the name Bryposis hypnoides Lamouroux, which is itself cryptogenic (type locality: Mediterranean coast of France) (Table 2).The red alga Dasya sessilis Yamada is native to Japan and Korea. It was introduced to France via oyster importation (Ver- laque, 2002), Spain via mussel cultivation (Peña & Bárbara, 2006), and Portugal, vector unknown (Araujo et al., 2009). Specimens ofD. sessilis were collected in 2008 on the floating docks in Corona- do Bay, San Diego; unidentified herbarium specimens in the Uni- versity of California at Berkeley’s Herbarium (UC), collected from docks in Huntington (in 2006) and Long Beach (in 1976) harbors, proved to be D. sessilis as well (Hughey et al., 2009). To confirm the identification, an analysis of part of the cytochrome oxidase subunit 2, the 5S RNA, and the cox2-cox3 spacer of the mitochon- drial genome was performed on one of the specimens from San Diego (Hughey et al., 2009). The DNA sequence was compared to unpublished GenBank sequences from an introduced speci- men of D. sessilis from Mediterranean France and from D. bail­ louviana (S. Gmelin) Montagne from Norway. Dasya sessilis from San Diego was found to be identical in sequence to the invasive Mediterranean specimen of D. sessilis, but differed from D. bail­ louviana by 12 bp (Hughey et al., 2009). A sequence from a third Dasya specimen in UC, collected from Coyote Point, San Francis- co Bay in 2005, was analyzed and found to differ from D. sessilis by 6 bp (Hughey et al., 2009). This specimen (Dasya sp. in Table1) appears to be another non-native species. The rbcL gene from the Huntington Beach and Long Beach specimens was identical to D. sessilis from San Diego (Hughey et al., 2009). This speciesTable 2. Some examples of species in need of further research to determine their status (native or introduced) in the California, USA,1 and Baja California, Mexico.2Chlorophyta (Green Algae) Bryopsis hypnoides Lamouroux1 Ulva pertusa Kjellman1, 2Ulva conglobata Kjellman1 Rhodophyta (Red Algae) Asparagopsis taxiformis Delile1, 2 Helminthocladia australis Harvey1 Pikea yoshizaki Maggs et Ward1 Phaeophyceae (Brown Algae) Tinocladia crassa (Suringar) Kylin1Sporochnus pedunculatus (Hudson) C. Agardh1, 2will probably be discovered at other sites in California and Baja California.Scytosiphon gracilis Kogame is a small tubular brown alga native to Japan and Korea. In January 2003, this species was first observed in Baja California in the intertidal zone at Playa Salda- mando, about 25 km north of Ensenada (Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2006). It was identified by morphology and by RuBisCo sequence, both of which matched specimens from Korea (Cho et al., 2001; Aguilar- Rosas et al., 2006). To date, this species has not been reported at other localities.The tiny red alga Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman, de- scribed from Japan, is broadly distributed in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, but is native to the Pacific (Broom et al., 2002). Molecular analysis of the nuclear small subunit rDNA (SSU) and internal transcribed spacers (ITS), which included material from Baja California, suggested that this species was probably intro- duced to the western Atlantic from the Pacific Ocean, and that the natural range of the species encompassed both sides of the Pacific coast (Broom et al., 2002). However, Aguilar-Rosas and Aguilar-Rosas (2003) concluded that P. suborbiculata was in fact introduced to Baja California sometime after 1985, when it was first reported, since surveys prior to that time did not reveal its presence. To date, it has been observed at 7 sites in northwestern Baja California (Aguilar-Rosas & Aguilar-Rosas, 2003), growing on rocks or epiphytic on upper intertidal seaweeds. In May 2011, Jef- fery Hughey discovered Porphyra suborbiculata in Tomales Bay in northern California, growing on barnacles affixed to the pillars in the upper intertidal; he confirmed the identification by sequenc- ing the large subunit of the RuBisCo gene (J. Hughey, personal communication of unpublished data).Ulva fasciata Delile is a foliose green alga, originally de- scribed from Egypt but considered widely distributed in the Atlan- tic, Indian and Pacific oceans. It has been reported as introduced in Hawaii and Australia (Phillips, 1988). It was collected at Playa Santa Elena, on the coast of Oaxaca (Mateo-Cid & Mendoza- González, 2001) and, in 2002, from the intertidal zone on the east- ern side of Todos Santos Bay (Playa Monalisa, Playa el Faro and Estero de Punta Banda), northwestern coast of Baja California (Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2005). The vegetative anatomy and phenol- ogy of Mexican plants matched those of collections from other parts of the world (Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2005). However, recent research indicates that U. fasciata could be conspecific to U. lactuca L. (O’Kelly et al., 2010). We retain this record until there are detailed studies of Ulva species from the Californias.Well-established introduced species. These are introduced spe- cies that have been observed at many sites on many occasions in the Californias, but for which adverse ecological impacts and/or invasive spread have not been demonstrated.Lomentaria hakodatensis Yendo is an inconspicuous red al- ga that has quietly spread from its native Japan, China and Koreato Italy, France, Spain, Russia, Philippines, Hawaiian Islands and Australia (Curiel et al., 2006). It has been recorded on the eastern Pacific coast, from British Columbia, Canada (South, 1968), Wash- ington (Hawkes & Scagel, 1986) and Oregon (Hansen, 1997) to California (Dawson & Neushul, 1966; Abbott & Hollenberg, 1976), the Gulf of California (Dawson, 1944) and Pacific Mexico (Setch- ell & Gardner, 1930; Dawson, 1950). It is considered exotic in the eastern Pacific because it was not observed in early surveys, e.g., E.Y. Dawson’s surveys of the northern coast from Cape Men- docino to Crescent City. However, some of the California and Baja California species also occur in Japan, making it difficult to deter- mine without good historical collections if a given species occurs naturally throughout the eastern and western north Pacific or if it is an introduction. Nevertheless, L. hakodatensis has increased in abundance on the northern California coast (e.g., Humboldt Bay) in the last two decades (Boyd et al., 2002).The subtidal brown alga Cutleria cylindrica Okamura is native to Japan and Korea and was first discovered on the west coast at Santa Catalina Island, California in 1973 (Hollenberg, 1978). It has subsequently been collected at La Jolla and San Clemente Island, in southern California, in the 1980s (Stewart, 1991), at Raul’s in Baja California, in 1990 (Aguilar-Rosas, 1994), and, in 2007, at Anacapa Island (K.A. Miller, personal communication). This species grows on pebbles in soft sediment, a habitat that is both less frequently colonized by native species and less frequently explored by ma- rine botanists. It appears to be a winter-spring annual in Califor- nia. Molecular work has linked the California populations to a population in Tsugaru Strait, Japan, where parthenogenic female gametophytes dominate under a wide range of temperatures, from 6-22°C (Kitayama et al., 1992; Kogishi et al., 2010). This species is well established at warm water sites and is gradually extending its distribution at the warm water islands. The mode and timing of its introduction to California and Baja California are unknown.Invasive or potentially invasive introduced species. These are species that have established rapidly and have the potential to compete with native species. Many are globally distributed.Oysters have been the vector for many introduced species, including Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt, a species that can be considered truly invasive due to its rapid spread. Introduced to the west coast from Japan before World War II, it was detected in British Columbia, Canada in 1944, Oregon in 1947 (Scagel, 1956), Crescent City, California in 1963, Santa Catalina Island in southern California in 1970 (Nicholson, 1979), and San Francisco Bay in 1973 (Silva, 1979). Since 1973, S. muticum has been reported in several localities throughout Baja California (Nienhuis, 1982; Aguilar-Ro- sas & Aguilar-Rosas, 1985; Riosmena-Rodríguez et al., 1992). This species has become a conspicuous and abundant part of our in- tertidal and shallow subtidal communities with varying degrees of impact on native communities (Ambrose & Nelson, 1982; Deysher & Norton, 1982; Wilson, 2001; Britton-Simmons, 2004).Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar, a 2 meter long kelp native to southeastern Russia, Japan, northern China and Korea, is an aggressive invasive species in the Mediterranean Sea, Eng- land, Atlantic Europe (where it was accidentally introduced with cultured oysters and then propagated as a crop), New Zealand, Australia, and Argentina (Silva et al., 2002). A variety of dispersal events (single introductions, multiple introductions, local site-to- site dispersal) as well as various microevolutionary processes (founder’s effect, bottlenecks, selection for novel, locally adapted gene combinations) are responsible for U. pinnatifida’s world- wide success (Voisin et al., 2005).Undaria was discovered in Los Angeles Harbor in 2000, and rapidly spread to Santa Barbara Harbor. In 2001, it appeared in Monterey Harbor and a small cove on the leeside of Santa Cata- lina Island (Silva et al., 2002; Thornber et al., 2004). At these sites, it is a short-lived annual, recruiting in the early spring, and with a smaller pulse of new sporophytes in the fall at some sites, and then disappearing for the winter (Thornber et al., 2004). In 2009, this species was discovered in San Francisco and Half Moon bays (Zabin et al., 2009), where it can be found throughout the year. Most of the California populations are limited to harbors and their artificial substrates, especially floats, piers and boat hulls. Santa Catalina Island is the only site in California at which it co-occurs with native seaweeds in a relatively natural (non-harbor) set- ting. However, the population at Santa Catalina Island is strictly subtidal, persisting at low densities in and around a Macrocystis pyrifera (Linnaeus) C. Agardh community. In 10 years of observa- tion at Catalina, Undaria has spread within the site, moving into shallower depths, but it has not extended its range to other sites around the island or to other islands (Miller & Engle, 2009). Simi- larly, in Baja California, this species is restricted to a small area on the protected side of Todos Santos Island and Punta Banda (Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2004). These populations, densest in the au- tumn, are mainly subtidal though in some years there are a few mature specimens in the intertidal zone. Uwai et al. (2006) traced the multiple Japanese origins of worldwide populations using molecular methods and speculated that the California and Baja California populations were introduced via shipping vectors.The brown alga Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh, na- tive to the warmer parts of Japan and Korea, has not been report- ed as an invasive species prior to its arrival in California. Sargas­ sum horneri was first collected in 2003 by biologists conducting surveys in inner Long Beach Harbor, California (Marine Biological Consultants, personal communication). By October 2005, the pop- ulation had spread within Long Beach Harbor. The Long Beach plants were attached to the substrate or epiphytic on Sargassum muticum. In Baja California, the first specimens of S. horneri were observed drifting in the intertidal zone at La Jolla in Todos Santos Bay in 2005. In 2008-2010, sampling in the intertidal and subtidal zone (to 10 m depth) revealed a well-established populations of S. horneri in several localities in Todos Santos Bay, Baja California,México. In 2006, S. horneri was discovered near the western end of Santa Catalina Island. Samples from 3 sites shared the same cox3 sequence as samples from the Seto Inland Sea, Japan (Mill- er et al., 2007). In one year, S. horneri spread rapidly along the entire lee side of the island, forming dense groves. In 2007, this species was documented on the windward side of Catalina Island and populations were discovered at 2 locations on the lee side of San Clemente Island, to the south (Miller & Engle, 2008). Currently,S. horneri forms very dense but patchy populations on both sides of Catalina Island, the lee side of San Clemente Island, and the east end of Santa Cruz Island as well as at several sites on the southern California mainland coast, including Laguna Beach and Crystal Cove (K.A. Miller, personal observation).Like Sargassummuticum, S. horneri ishighlyinvasivebecause it is adapted for widespread dispersal and rapid colonization (Ny- berg & Valentinus, 2005), due to morphological and reproductive characteristics, such as buoyancy and high reproductive output (Aguilar-Rosas & Aguilar-Rosas, 1993; Miller et al., 2007). However, it will probably be limited to warm temperate/subtropical sites.The red alga Caulacanthus ustulatus (Mertens ex Turner) Kützing is a cosmopolitan, cryptogenic species, reported from Japan, Indonesia, South Africa, Spain, New Zealand - all places where plants have been designated as types for species now considered synonyms of C. ustulatus (Zuccarello et al., 2002). This small, turf species also occurs in Australia, Africa, India, Hawaii, and Mexico as well as British Columbia, Canada, Washington and California. In southern California, Caulacanthus has been ob- served at numerous sites during the last decade (S. Murray, per- sonal communication), but was not recorded 30 years ago during extensive intertidal surveys sponsored by the government (Mur- ray & Littler, 1981) nor 40 years ago when E.Y. Dawson conducted intensive surveys (Dawson, 1959). It is also reported from central California (Santa Cruz, CA), San Francisco Bay (Miller, 2004), and Tomales Bay in northern California (specimens in UC). It appears to be spreading northward.In contrast, there are few records of C. ustulatus in Baja Cali- fornia. Dawson (1944) published the first record in the Gulf of Cali- fornia at Punta San Pedro, Sonora and Bahia Agua Verde, Baja California Sur. On the Pacific coast, Dawson (1961) reported it at some localities between Cedros Island, Baja California and Bahia Magdalena, Baja California Sur. Since that time, although there have been several collecting trips it has not been observed in the Pacific coast of Baja California.In 2000, the green alga Caulerpa taxifolia was discovered in southern California. Caulerpa taxifolia has proven itself to be a devastating plague in the Mediterranean (Meinesz et al., 1993). Distasteful to herbivores, it has covered acres of seafloor, out- competing native seagrasses and smothering native fauna. This escaped invasive aquarium strain, identified as originating in Australia and subsequently hybridizing with other strains, is tol-erant of warm temperate waters (Meusnier et al., 2002). During eelgrass surveys, Caulerpa was discovered in a shallow lagoon, Agua Hedionda, near San Diego, and in Huntington Harbor, Cali- fornia (Jousson et al., 2000). Because the plant fragments and re- generates, it cannot be manually removed (Williams & Grosholtz, 2002). Caulerpa patches were covered with tarp and bleach was injected beneath (Williams & Schroeder, 2004). Several years of this treatment (and several million dollars) resulted in a victory; Caulerpa taxifolia was declared eradicated in 2004 (Merkel & As- sociates, 2005). Because of this concerted effort, the dispersal of this species along the coast of California and Baja was stopped.Recent introductions. A non-native species recently identified in California is the Japanese red alga Grateloupia lanceolata (Okamura) Kawaguchi (Miller et al., 2009). This species was dis- covered in southern California at Santa Catalina Island in spring 2003 and April 2008 and in central California at the mouth of the Elkhorn Slough in Moss Landing in May, June and July of 2008. It has since been reported from San Diego, Port Hueneme and San Francisco Bay, California (Hughey et al., 2009). The morphology of thalli agrees with published figures, and both populations were abundantly reproductive. Sequences from the large subunit of the rbcL gene and the nuclear marker, ITS-1 from Californian G. lan­ ceolata were identical to those from two specimens of G. lanceo­ lata introduced to the Thau Lagoon, Mediterranean France and a specimen from Japan (Miller et al., 2009, Hughey et al., 2009). This species has also been reported from the Canary Islands (García- Jiménez et al., 2008). It is likely that the import of oysters for mari- culture played a role in its introduction into California, and equally likely that this conspicuous species has been confused with other foliose red algae until now. We predict that this species will soon be discovered in Baja California.Another recent addition to the California and Baja California flora is the red alga Grateloupia turuturu Yamada, a species native to Japan and Korea but widely invasive throughout the world. In 1973, it was first reported outside of its native range in Portsmouth, England (Farnham & Irvine, 1973). Grateloupia turuturu spreads by spores contained in the ballast water of ships (Villalard-Bohnsack & Harlin, 1997). Based on the aggressiveness of this species, as well as its presence in major shipping ports, G. turuturu was pre- dicted to spread throughout North America and the rest of the world (Simon et al., 1999). Gavio and Fredericq (2002) were the first to show that G. turuturu was the correct name to apply to the invasive Atlantic North American species that was incorrectly identified as G. doryphora (Montagne) M. A. Howe.For the west coast of North America, G. turuturu was first ob- served in the port of Ensenada, Baja California in November 2008. The identification was confirmed by DNA sequence (Aguilar-Ro- sas et al., submitted). The population has not spread beyond this first observation. The first report of G. turuturu in California was from Santa Barbara Harbor in August 2009 (Hughey et al., 2009).To confirm the identification, molecular analyses on two of the Santa Barbara specimens using ITS-1 and rbcL gene sequences were performed; DNA sequences were identical to previously published sequences of G. turuturu from Japan and Korea, and to introduced specimens from New Zealand, North America, Britain, and France (Hughey et al., 2009). In Santa Barbara, G. turuturu was found attached growing on the docks in a 1,133 slip-harbor that accommodates resident house and pleasure boats, and trav- eling sail boats and yachts. Since G. turuturu was growing in this small harbor, it is likely that this seaweed was introduced by trav- eling boaters, rather than by commercial shipping vessels. If this is the case, Santa Barbara is not likely the site of primary intro- duction. It is more probable that G. turuturu was first established in a larger shipping port, then secondarily introduced via sail boat by attachment to the hull, although an analysis of the latter mode of introduction by recreational yachts was found unlikely (Mineur et al., 2008). However, this species was recently discovered (Sep- tember 2010) at Pillar Point Marina in Half Moon Bay, San Mateo County (K.A. Miller, personal communication) and we expect to find it in San Francisco Bay.A non-native species recently reported from Baja California is the brown alga Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh (Mazariegos-Villareal et al., 2010), a brown alga native to England. It is widespread on temperate coasts mainly in Europe, Africa, Australia, New Zealand (Guiry & Guiry, 2011) and eastern North America (Sears, 1998). Records from the Pacific coast include Argentina (Skottsberg, 1921), Chile (Ramírez & Santelices, 1991) and Baja California Sur (Mazariegos-Villareal et al., 2010). Mazar- iegos-Villareal et al. (2010) reported several observations of this species in the mid-intertidal zone to 6 m depth at the southern end of Bahía Sebastián Vizcaíno during a study of juvenile lobster habitat (Castañeda-Fernandez de Lara et al., 2005). Mazariegos- Villareal et al. (2010) consider it an unintentional introduction, probably via shipping from Australia to Baja California.PERSPECTIvESfuture introductions? There are many cryptogenic species in the Californias; a very few are listed in Table 2. The genus Bryopsis needs critical study to establish the provenance of Bryopsis hyp­ noides and the undetermined, introduced species in this genus. The genus Ulva is largely unknown, although Hayden and Waa- land (2004) analyzed several California specimens. Ulva pertusa Kjellman, considered an invasive in the Thau Lagoon (Verlaque et al., 2002), has been reported from California (Hayden & Waa- land, 2004) and Baja California (Aguilar-Rosas et al., 2008) but it is not known whether this species is native or introduced. Ulva conglobata Kjellman, also native to Japan, China and Korea, was identified at the Farallon Islands west of San Francisco (C. Tanner, personal communication), but its identity needs to be confirmed with molecular methods.Maggs and Ward (1996) suggest that the Japanese species Pikea yoshiyaki Maggs & Ward occurs in southern California; further collections and study are called for, especially since the native species in the genus needs further delineation (Maggs & Ward, 1996). This list will continue to grow as more questions about species identities and ranges arise.Based on patterns of introductions in other parts of the world, it is very probable that more seaweed species will be in- troduced to the Californias (Table 3). Many of these (Grateloupia asiatica Kawaguchi & Wang, Grateloupia subpectinata Holmes, Grateloupia imbricata Holmes) have been reported in the Thau Lagoon (Verlaque et al., 2002; Verlaque et al., 2005). Grateloupia imbricata has recently been identified in the Canary Islands (Gar- cía-Jiménez et al., 2008) as well. Heterosiphonia japonica Yendo (“Dasysiphonia sp.”) is an aggressive invasive species in Europe (Husa & Sjotun, 2006) and, very recently, in Rhode Island (Sch- neider, 2010). While this species has been reported in California (Abbott & Hollenberg, 1976), the aggressive strain is apparently absent.Introductions and climate changes. It is also readily apparent that many of the introductions reported here are recent (this does not exclude the possibility of historical introductions of what we now consider cryptogenic species). Most introductions have oc- curred, or been detected, since the 1970s, and many in the last 10 years. Are the numbers of introductions higher than before? Are they a response to new climatic conditions?Lomentaria hakodatensis, Sargassum muticum and perhaps Cutleria cylindrica are probably the earliest introductions to the Californias. It is impossible to trace the date of the introductions of most of these species, especially the tiny epiphytes and fila- ments. There is long tradition of oyster culture on the west coast of North America (Beattie, 1982; Mineur et al., 2007). Several in- troductions can be linked to oyster mariculture (Sargassum muti­ cum, Neosiphonia harveyi, Grateloupia lanceolata, Caulacanthus ustulatus, Gelidium vagum, Ceramium kondoi) but we do not know if these are primary introductions from Asia or secondary ones from Washington or British Columbia, Canada or Europe. Presum-Table 3. Some examples of species that are likely to be introduced to California, USA, and Baja California, Mexico in the future.Rhodophyta (Red Algae)Grateloupia asiatica Kawaguchi et Wang Grateloupia subpectinata Holmes Grateloupia imbricata HolmesHeterosiphonia japonica Yendo (“Dasysiphonia sp.” invasive strain)Womersleyella setacea (Hollenberg) R.E. Norrisably the rest of these introductions can be attributed to interna- tional shipping and subsequent spread via local craft or natural dispersal, especially those occurring at some distance from inter- national ports (Wasson et al., 2001; Zabin et al., 2009).The increase in international shipping in the 20th century and the opportunity for species to move via ballast water or hull foul- ing are well established (Carlton & Geller, 1993). California’s large international ports in San Francisco Bay and the Los Angeles area host a steady stream of ships from all over the world. Although the port of Ensenada, Baja California is not large, during the last two decades the traffic of cargo ships from Asian countries and large tourist boats from Los Angeles and San Diego has increased dramatically, as has the possibility of the introduction and estab- lishment of nonnative species. The vectors are in place.According to Carlton (1996b), several processes mediate invasions, including changes in donor and recipient regions, “in- vasion windows” in recipient regions when conditions are right (e.g., available niche) for the establishment of an introduced spe- cies, and stochastic inoculation events. Several authors have pro- posed that climate change has direct effects on these factors.Occhipinti-Ambrogi and Savini (2003), using examples from the Mediterranean and Black Sea region, emphasize the environ- mental status of the recipient area as a prerequisite for the suc- cessful establishment of non-native species. The spread of Caul­ erpa taxifolia in the northwestern basin of the Mediterranean Sea was facilitated by the instability of the endemic Posidonia oce­ anica (L.) Delile community due to both natural and anthropogenic stressors. Similarly, the mainland coast in southern California has been severely stressed by development and pollution, very pos- sibly allowing the bloom of Caulacanthus ustulatus, currently a dominant in the upper intertidal zone where it was historically absent.Experiments with native and non-native tunicates by Sta- chowicz et al. (2002) indicated that the greatest effects of climate change on biotic communities is due more to changing maximum and minimum temperatures rather than different annual means. Introduced species recruit and grow earlier relative to native species, shifting dominance to non-native species. The series of ENSO (El Niño/La Niña-Southern Oscillation) events along the west coast in the last 30 years was remarkable, with especially large swings in temperature in 1983-4 and 1998-9. These dramatic temperature shifts may have opened an “invasion window” for species that may have failed to establish in the past, and may ac- count for the recent list of new introductions.While temperature is one of the strongest signals of climate change, and may be predicted to influence species ranges by pushing cool temperate species north and encouraging the es- tablishment of warm temperate non-native species, Harley et al.(2006) predict that climate change will bring effects that are more complex and subtle. They cite changes in ocean chemistry that will affect the structure of many carbonate-dependent species, changes in ocean circulation that will affect the transport of prop- agules, changes in community interactions, especially predators and herbivores that will affect food webs, and pressures on key species that will have community-wide consequences. Along the west coast, alterations in the California Current and patterns of seasonal upwelling could negatively affect the kelps that depend on the nutrients characteristic of cold water. These ecosystem engineers provide habitat for whole communities. During strong ENSO events, even the relatively short-term demise of kelp for- ests is stunning, and recovery can be slow, especially if herbi- vores, such as urchins, are common. The long-term loss of key community players (kelps, coralline algae, important herbivores) combined with decimation of key predators due to overfishing, would surely open up opportunities for introduced species that have been unable to establish in the past. Currently in California and Baja California, the rich diversity and abundance of native species, especially on the wild open coast, may be inhibiting inva- sions (Wasson et al., 2005), but this may change.ACKNOWlEDGMENTSThis paper grew out of a presentation at Korea’s National Institute of Biological Resources international symposium entitled “Climate Change and Biodiversity” in 2008. The first author is grateful to Byung-Jin Kim, Chong-wook Park, and especially Sung Min Boo for this opportunity. The authors wish to thank the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California and CONABIO (FB1389/GN007/09), and the California Department of Fish and Game/Office of Spill Prevention and Response’s Introduced Species Study (P0875029) for their support of this research. We also thank 3 reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript.REfERENCESAbbott, I. A. & G. J. HollenberG. 1976. Marine Algae of California. Stanford University Press. 827 p.Ambrose, r. F. & b. V. nelson. 1982. Inhibition of giant kelp recruitment by an introduced brown alga. Botanica Marina 25: 265-267.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r. 1994. Notas ficológicas. 1. Primer registro de Cutleria cylindrica Okamura (Cutleriaceae, Phaeophyta) para las costas del Pacifico de México. Acta Botánica Mexicana 29: 55-60.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r. & l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs. 1985. Sargassum muticum (Yen- do) Fensholt (Fucales, Phaeophyta) in Baja California coast, Mexico. Ciencias Marinas 11: 127-129.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r. & l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs. 1993. Cronología de la coloniza- ción de Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta) en las costas de la penín-sula de Baja California, México (1971-1990). Revista de Investigación Científica 4: 41-51.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r. & l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs. 2003. El género Porphyra (Ban- giales, Rhodophyta) en la costa del Pacífico de México. I. Porphyra suborbiculata Kjellman. Hidrobiológica 13 (1): 51-56.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r., l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs & F. F. PedrocHe. 2005. Ulva fasciata Delile (Ulvaceae, Chlorophycota): a species newly introduced into Pacific Mexico. Botanica Marina 48: 46-51.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r., l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs & s. sHImAdA. 2008. First record of Ulva pertusa Kjellman (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in the Pacific coast of México. Algae 23: 201-207.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r., l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs, G. ÁVIlA-serrAno & r. mArcos- rAmírez. 2004. First record of Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) on the Pacific coast of Mexico. Botánica Marina 47: 255-258.AGuIlAr-rosAs, r., l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs, G. Y. cHo & s. m. boo. 2006. First record of Scytosiphon gracilis Kogame (Scytosiphonaceae, Phaeo- phyceae) for the Pacific coast of México. Algae 21: 11-13.AGuIlAr-rosAs, l. e., r. AGuIlAr-rosAs, H. KAwAI, s. uwAI & e. VAlenzuelA- esPInozA. 2007. New record of Sargassum filicinum Harvey (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in the Pacific coast of Mexico. Algae 22: 17-21.ArAuJo, r., I. bÁrbArA, m. tIbAldo, e. berecIbAr, P. d. tAPIA, r. PereIrA, r. sAntos & I.s. PInto. 2009. Checklist of benthic marine algae and cya- nobacteria of northern Portugal. Botánica Marina 52: 24-46.bArrett, e. m. 1963. Fish Bulletin 123. The California Oyster Industry. UC San Diego: Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library.beAttIe, J. H. 1982. Overview of oyster culture on the Pacific Coast. In: Proceedings of the North American Oyster Workshop, World Mari­ culture Society, Special Publication No. 1, Baton Rouge, USA, pp. 11-15.bellorIn, A. m., m. c. olIVeIrA & e. c. olIVeIrA. 2002. Phylogeny and sys- tematics of the marine algal family Gracilariaceae (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) based on SSU rDNA and ITS sequences of Atlantic and Pacific species. Journal of Phycology 38: 551-563.bellorIn, A., m. c. olIVeIrA, & e. c. olIVeIrA. 2004. Gracilaria vermiculophyl­ la: A western Pacific species of Gracilariaceae (Rhodophyta) first recorded from the eastern Pacific. Phycological Research 52: 69-79.bootH, d., J. ProVAn & c. mAGGs. 2007. Molecular approaches to the study of invasive seaweeds. Botánica Marina 50: 385-396.bossArd, c. c., J. m. rAndAll, & m. c. HosHoVsKY. 2000. Invasive Plants of California’s Wildlands. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 360 p.boYd, m. J., t. J. mullIGAn & F. J. sHAuGHnessY. 2002. Non-indigenous marine species of Humboldt Bay. California Department of Fish and Game. California. http://www.humboldtbay.org/conservation/exotic- species/non_indigenous_marine_boyd_etal_2002.pdf.brItton-sImmons, K. H. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of the introduced alga Sargassum muticum on benthic, subtidal communities of Wash- ington State, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 277: 61-78.brodIe, J. b. & J. lewIs. 2007. Unravelling the algae: the past, present and future of algal systematics. CRC Press. 402 p.broom, J. e., w. A. nelson, c. YArIsH, w. A. Jones, r. AGuIlAr-rosAs & l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs. 2002. A reassessment of the taxonomic status of Por­ phyra suborbiculata, Porphyra carolinensis and Porphyra lilliputiana (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) based on molecular and morphological data. European Journal of Phycology 37: 227-235.bullerI, F., J. F. bruno & l. benedettI-ceccHI. 2008. Beyond competition: incorporating positive interactions between species to predict eco- system invasibility. PLoS Biology 6: e162.cArlton, J. t. 1979. Introduced invertebrates of San Francisco Bay. In: Conomos, T. John (Ed.). San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Sci­ ence. San Francisco, CA, pp. 427-444.cArlton, J. t. 1996a. Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Eco­ logy 77: 1653-1655.cArlton, J. t. 1996b. Pattern, process, and prediction in marine invasion ecology. Biological Conservation 78: 97-106.cArlton, J. t. 2000. Global change and biological invasions in the oceans. In: Mooney, H. A. & R. J. Hobbs (Eds.) Invasive species in a changing world. Island Press. Covelo, CA, pp. 31-53.cArlton, J. t. & J. b. Geller. 1993. Ecological roulette: the global transport of non-indigenous marine organisms. Science 261 (5117): 78-82.cAstAñedA-FernÁndez de lArA, V., m. J. butler IV, s. Hern;Andez-VÁzquez,s. GuzmÁn del Próo & e. serVIere-zArAGozA. 2005. Determination of preferred habitats of early benthic juvenile California spiny lobster, Panulirus interruptus, on the Pacific coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Marine & Freshwater Research 56: 1-9.cHo, G. Y., H. s. Yoon, H.-G. cHoI, K. KoGAme & s. m. boo. 2001. Phylogeny of the family Scytosiphonaceae (Phaeophyta) from Korea based on sequences of plastid-encoded RuBisCo spacer region. Algae 16: 145-150.cHo, t. o., s. m. boo & G. I. HAnsen. 2002. Structure and reproduction of the genus Ceramium (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Oregon, USA. Phycologia 40: 547-571.cHo, t. o., b. Y. won & s. FrederIcq. 2005. Antithamnion nipponicum (Ce- ramiaceae, Rhodophyta), incorrectly known as A. pectinatum in western Europe, is a recent introduction along the North Carolina and Pacific coasts of North America. European Journal of Phycol­ ogy 40: 323-335.coHen, A. n. & J. t. cArlton. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279 (5350): 555-558.costello, c. J. & A. r. solow. 2003. On the pattern of discovery of intro- duced species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 3321-3323.coYer, J. A., G. HoArAu, m.-P. oudot-lesecq, w. t. stAm & J. l. olsen. 2006. A mtDNA-based phylogeny of the brown algal genus Fucus (Hetero- kontophyta; Phaeophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 209-222.coYer, J. A., G. HoArAu, J. VAn scHAIK, P. luIJcKz & J. l. olsen. 2010. Trans- Pacific and trans-Arctic pathways of the intertidal macroalga Fucus distichus reveal multiple glacial refugia and colonization from the North Pacific to the North Atlantic. Journal of Biogeography 38: 756- 771.curIel, d., G. bellemo, m. scAttolIn & m. mArzoccHI. 2006. First report of Lomentaria hakodatensis (Lomentariaceae, Rhodophyta) from the lagoon of Venice. Acta Adriatica 47: 65-72.dAwson, e. Y. 1944. The marine algae of the Gulf of California. Allan Han­ cock Pacific Expeditions 3: 189-432.dAwson, e. Y. 1950. Notes on Pacific Coast Marine Algae. V. American Journal of Botany 37: 337-344.dAwson, e. Y. 1951. A further study of upwelling and associated vegeta- tion along Pacific Baja California México. Journal of Marine Re­ search 10: 39-58.dAwson, e. Y. 1959. A preliminary report on the benthic marine flora of southern California. California State Water Pollution Control Board Publications 20: 169-264.dAwson, e. Y. 1961. Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico, Part 4: Gigartina- les. Pacific Naturalist 2: 191-343.dAwson, e. Y. 1962. Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico . Part 7. Ceramia- les: Ceramiaceae, Delesseriaceae. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedi­ tions 26: 1-207.dAwson, e. Y. & m. neusHul. 1966. New records of marine algae from Ana- capa Island, California. Nova Hedwigia 12: 173-187.deYsHer, l. & t. A. norton. 1982. Dispersal and colonization in Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 56: 179-195.dIxon, P. s. 1964. Asparagopsis in Europe. Nature, London 201: 902. drueHl, l. 1973. Marine transplantations. Science 179: 1-12.duKes, J. s. & H. A. mooneY. 1999. Does global change increase the suc- cess of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 135- 139.FArnHAm, w. F. 1994. Introduction of marine benthic algae into Atlantic Eu- ropean waters. In: Boudouresque, C.-F., F. Briand & C. Nolan (Eds.). Introduced species in European coastal waters. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Commission, pp. 32-36.FArnHAm, w. F. & l. m. IrVInG. 1973. The addition of a foliose species of Grateloupia to the British marine flora. British Phycological Journal 8: 208-209.FeldmAnn, J. & G. FeldmAnn. 1942. Recherches sur les Bonnemaisonia- cées et leur alternance de générations. Annales des Sciences Na­ turelles, Botanique 11 (3): 75-175.GAltsoFF, P. s. 1930. Oyster industry of the Pacific coast of the U.S. ReportU.S. Commissioner Fisheries, pp. 367-400.GArcíA-JIménez, P., J. l. GerAldIno, s. m. boo & r. r. robAInA. 2008. Red alga Grateloupia imbricata (Halymeniaceae), a species introduced to the Canary Islands. Phycological Research 56: 166-171.GAVIo, b. & s. FrederIcq. 2002. Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rho- dophyta) is the correct name of the non-native species in the Atlan- tic known as Grateloupia doryphora. European Journal of Phycology 37: 349-360.GoFF, l. J., d. A. moon & A. w. colemAn. 1994. Molecular delineation of species and species relationships in the red algal agarophytes Gracilariopsis and Gracilaria (Gracilariales). Journal of Phycology 30: 521-537.GrosHolz, e. d. 2005. Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 1088-1091.GuIrY, m. d. & G. m. GuIrY. 2011. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic pub- lication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algae- base.org; searched on 22 March 2011.HAnsen, G. I. 1997. A revised checklist and preliminary assessment of the macrobenthic marine algae and seagrasses of Oregon. In: Kaye, T. N., A. Liston, R. M. Love, D. L. Luoma, R. J. Meinke & M. V. Wilson (Eds.). Conservation and Management of Native Flora and Fungi. Corvallis: Native Plant Society of Oregon, pp. 175-200.HArleY, c., A. r. HuGHes, K. m. HultGren, b. mIner, c. J. b. sorte, c. s. tHornber, l. F. rodrIGuez, l. tomAneK & s. l. wIllIAms. 2006. The im- pacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters 9: 228-241.HAwKes, m. w. & r. F. scAGel. 1986. The marine algae of British Columbia and northern Washington: division Rhodophyta (red algae), class Rhodophyceae, order Rhodymeniales. Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 1549-1580.HAYden, H. s. & J. r. wAAlAnd. 2004. A molecular systematic study of Ulva (Ulvaceae, Ulvales) from the northeast Pacific. Phycologia 43: 364- 382.HollenberG, G. J. 1978. Phycological notes VIII: Two brown algae (Pha- eophyta) new to California. Bulletin of the Southern California Acad­ emy of Sciences 77: 28-35.HommersAnd, m. H., m. d. GuIrY, s. FrederIcq & G. l. leIster. 1993. New perspectives in the taxonomy of the Gigartinaceae (Gigartinales,Rhodophyta). Proceedings of the International Seaweed Symposium14: 105-120.HuGHeY, J. r., c. K. KIeldsen, P. c. sIlVA, r. l. moe & t. c. decew. 1996.Noteworthy collections: California. Madroño 43: 432-436.HuGHeY, J. r., K. A. mIller & A. lYmAn. 2009. Noteworthy collections: Cali- fornia. Madroño 56: 293-295.HusA, V. & K. sJotun. 2006. Vegetative reproduction in ‘Heterosiphonia japonica’ (Dasyaceae, Ceramiales, Rhodophyta), an introduced red alga on European coasts. Botánica Marina 49: 191-199.JoHnson, c. r. & r. o. cHAPmAn. 2007. Seaweed invasions: introduction and scope. Botánica Marina 50: 321-325.Jousson, o., J. PAwlowsKI, l. zAnInettI, F. w. zecHmAn, F. dInI, G. dI GuIsePPe, r. woodFIeld, A. mIllAr & A. meInesz. 2000. Invasive alga reaches California. Nature 408: 157.JosselYn, m. & J. A. west. 1985. The distribution and temporal dynam- ics of the estuarine macroalgal community of San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129: 139-152.KItAYAmA, t., H. KAwAI & t. YosHIdA. 1992. Dominance of female gameto- phytes in field populations of Cutleria cylindrica (Cutleriales, Phaeo- phyceae) in the Tsugaru Strait, Japan. Phycologia 31: 449-461.KItAYAmA, t., K. A. mIller & P. c. sIlVA. 2005. First record of Elachista nigra (Chordariales, Phaeophyceae) from California, North America. Bul­ letin of the National Science Museum 31: 57-60.KoGIsHI, K., t. KItAYAmA, t. HAnYudA, K. A. mIller & H. KAwAI. 2010. Phy- logeography of Cutleria cylindrica (Cutleriales, Phaeophyceae) in northeastern Asia, and the identity of an introduced population in California. Journal of Phycology 46: 553-558.leVIn, P. s., J. A. coYer, r. PetrIK & t. P. Good. 2002. Community-wide ef- fects of non-indigenous species on temperate reefs. Ecology 83: 3182-3193.mAGGs, c. A. & b. A. wArd. 1996. The genus Pikea (Dumontiaceae, Rho- dophyta) in England and the north Pacific: comparative morphologi- cal, life history and molecular studies. Journal of Phycology 32: 176- 193.mAteo-cId, l. e. & c. A. mendozA-GonzÁlez. 2001. Algas marinas bentóni- cas de la costa de Oaxaca, México. Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas México 47: 11-26.mAzArIeGos-VIllAreAl, A., r. rIosmenA-rodríGuez, A. r. rIVerA-cAmAcHo &e. serVIere-zArAGozA. 2010. First report of Cladostephus spongiosus (Sphacelariales: Phaeophyta) from the Pacific coast of México. Bo­ tanica Marina 53: 153-157.mcIVor, l., c. mAGGs, J. ProVAn & m. J. stAnHoPe. 2001. rbcL sequences reveal multiple cryptic introductions of the Japanese red alga Poly­ siphonia harveyi. Molecular Ecology 10: 911-919.mcKInneY, m. l. & J. l. locKwood. 1999. Biotic homogenization: a few win- ners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends in Evolution and Ecology 14: 450-453.meInesz, A., J. deVAuGelAs, b. Hesse & x. mArI. 1993. Spread of the intro- duced tropical green alga Caulerpa taxifolia in northern Mediterra- nean waters. Journal of Applied Phycology 5: 141-147.merKel & AssocIAtes. 2005. Eradication and surveillance of Caulerpa taxi- folia within Agua Hedionda Lagoon, Carlsbad, California. Fourth Year Status Report. Report prepared for Southern California Caulerpa Ac- tion Team. 13 p.meusnIer, I., m. VAlero, c. destombe, c. Godé, e. desmArAIs, P. bonHomme,w. t. stAm & J. l. olsen. 2002. Polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism analyses of nuclear and chlo- roplast DNA provide evidence for recombination, multiple introduc- tions and nascent speciation in the Caulerpa taxifolia complex. Mo­ lecular Ecology 11: 2317-2325.mIller, A. w., A. l. cHAnG, n. cosentIno-mAnnInG & G. m. ruIz. 2004. A new record and eradication of the northern Atlantic alga Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae) from San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Journal of Phycology 40: 1028-1031.mIller, K. A. 2004. California’s non-native seaweeds. Fremontia, A Jour- nal of the California Native Plant Society 32: 10-15.mIller, K. A., J. m. enGle, s. uwAI & H. KAwAI. 2007. First report of the Asian seaweed Sargassum filicinum Harvey (Fucales) in California, USA. Biological Invasions 9: 609-613.mIller, K. A., J. r. HuGHeY & P. w. GAbrIelson. 2009. First report of the Japanese species Grateloupia lanceolata (Halymeniaceae, Rho- dophyta) from California, USA. Phycological Research 57: 238-241.mIller, K. A. & J. m. enGle. 2009. The natural history of Undaria pinnatifida and Sargassum filicinum at the California Channel Islands: non-na- tive seaweeds with different invasion styles. In: Damiani, C. C. & D. K. Garcelon (Eds.). Proceedings of the Seventh California Islands Sym­ posium. Institute for Wildlife Studies, Arcata, CA, pp. 131-140.mIneur, F., t. belsHer, m. P. JoHnson, c. A. mAGGs & m. VerlAque. 2007. Experimental assessment of oyster transfers as a vector for mac- roalgal introductions. Biological Conservation 137: 237-247.mIneur, F., m. P. JoHnson & c. A. mAGGs. 2008. Macroalgal introductions by hull fouling on recreational vessels: seaweeds and sailors. Envi­ ronmental Management 42: 667-676.murrAY, s. n. & m. m. lIttler. 1981. Biogeographical analysis of intertidal macrophyte floras of southern California. Journal of Biogeography 8: 339-351.ní cHuAlÁIn, F., c. A. mAGGs, G. w. sAunders & m. d. GuIrY. 2004. The in- vasive genus Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniaceae, Rhodophyta): mo- lecular systematics, morphology, and ecophysiology of Falkenbergia isolates. Journal of Phycology 40: 1112-1126.nIcHolson, n. l. 1979. Sargassum muticum: a Japanese seaweed contin- ues moving into new waters. 2nd National Coastal Shallow Wash­ ington Research Conference. 167 p.nIenHuIs, P. H. 1982. Attached Sargassum muticum found in the South- west Netherlands. Aquatic Botany 12: 189-195.norrIs, r. e. & e. conwAY. 1975. Fucus spiralis L. in the northeast Pacific.Syesis 7: 79-81.nYberG, c. d. & I. VAlentInus. 2005. Can species traits be used to predict marine macroalgal introduction? Biological Invasions 7: 265-279.occHIPIntI-AmbroGI, A. & d. sAVInI. 2003. Biological invasions as a compo- nent of global change in stressed marine ecosystems. Marine Pollu­ tion Bulletin 46: 542-551.o’KellY, c. J., A. KurIHArA, t. c. sHIPleY, & A. r. sHerwood. 2010. Molecular assessment of Ulva spp. (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) in the Hawaiian Islands. Journal of Phycology 46: 728-735.PAdIllA, d. K. & s. l. wIllIAms. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosys- tems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2: 131-138.PedrocHe, F. F., P. c. sIlVA & m. cHAcAnA. 2002. El género Codium (Codia- ceae, Chlorophyta) en el Pacífico de México. In: Sentíes, A. & K. M. Dreckmann (Eds.). Monografías ficológicas. UAM-Iztapalapa y Red Latinoamericana de Botánica, México, pp. 11-74.PedrocHe, F. F., P. c. sIlVA, l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs, K. m. drecKmAnn & r. AGuI- lAr-rosAs. 2005. Catálogo de las algas marinas bentónicas del Pací­ fico de México. I. Chlorophycota. UABC., Ensenada. 135 p.PedrocHe, F. F., P. c. sIlVA, l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs, K. m. drecKmAnn & r. AGuI- lAr-rosAs. 2008. Catálogo de las algas marinas bentónicas del Pací­ fico de México. II. Phaeophycota. UAM-I, Ensenada. 146 p.PeñA, V. & I. bÁrbArA. 2006. Revision of the genus Dasya (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) in Galicia (NW Spain) and the addition of a new alien species Dasya sessilis Yamada for the European Atlantic coasts. Anales del Jardin Botánico de Madrid 63: 13-26.PHIllIPs, J. A. 1988. Field, anatomical and developmental studies on Southern Australian species of Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta). Aus­ tralian Systematic Botany 1: 411-456.rAmírez, m. e. & b. sAntelIces. 1991. Catálogo de las algas marinas bentó- nicas de la costa temperada del Pacífico de Sudamérica. Monogra­ fías Biológicas 5: 1-437.renFrew, d. e., P. w. GAbrIelson & r. F. scAGel. 1989. The marine algae of British Columbia, northern Washington, and southeast Alaska: divi- sion Rhodophyta (red algae), class Rhodophyceae, order Gelidiales. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 3295-3314.rIberA-sIGuAn, A. 2002. Review of non-native marine plants in the Medi- terranean Sea. In: Leppäkoski, E., S. Gollasch & S. Olenin (Eds.). In­ vasive Aquatic Species of Europe, Distribution, Impact and Manage­ ment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, NDL , pp. 291-310.rIosmenA-rodríGuez, r., d. A. sIqueIros beltrones, o. GArcíA de lA rosA &V. rocHA rAmírez. 1992 [1991]. The extension geographic range of selected seaweeds on the Baja California Peninsula. Revista de In­ vestigación Científica 2: 13-20.rueness, J. 2005. Life history and molecular sequences of Gracilaria ver­ miculophylla (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta), a new introduction to Eu- ropean waters. Phycologia 44: 120-128.scAGel, r. F. 1956. Introduction of a Japanese alga Sargassum muticum into the northeast Pacific. Fisheries Research Paper Washington Department of Fisheries 1: 1-10.scHneIder, c. w. 2010. Report of a new invasive alga in the Atlantic United States “Heterosiphonia” japonica in Rhode Island. Journal of Phy­ cology 46: 653-657.seArs, J. r. (ed.). 1998. NEAS keys to the benthic marine algae of the northeastern coast of North America from Long Island Sound to the Strait of Belle Isle. Northeast Algal Society. 163 p.setcHell, w. A. & n. l. GArdner. 1903. Algae of northwestern America.University of California Publications in Botany 1: 165-418.setcHell, w. A. & n. l. GArdner. 1920. The marine algae of the Pacific coast of North America. Part II. Chlorophyceae. University of Califor­ nia Publications in Botany 8: 139-374.setcHell, w. A. & n. l. GArdner. 1925. The marine algae of the Pacific coast of North America. Part III. Melanophyceae. University of Cali­ fornia Publications in Botany 8: 383-898.setcHell, w. A. & n. l. GArdner. 1930. Marine algae of the Revillagigedo Islands Expedition in 1925. Proceeding of the California Academy of Science 4 (19): 109-215.sIlVA, P. c. 1979. The benthic algal flora of central San Francisco Bay. In: Conomos, T. J. (Ed.). San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Sci­ ence. San Francisco, CA, pp. 287-345.sIlVA, P. c. 1996. California seaweeds collected by the Malaspina Expe- dition, especially Pelvetia (Fucales, Phaeophyceae). Madroño 43: 345-354.sIlVA, P. c. 2004. Distribution of California seaweeds. Fremontia, A Jour­ nal of the California Native Plant Society 32: 18-26.sIlVA, P. c., r. A. woodFIeld, A. n. coHen, l. HArrIs & J. H. r. GoddArd. 2002. First report of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. Biological Invasions 4: 333-338.sImon, c., e. ArGAll, G. leVAVAsseur & e. deslAndes. 1999. Effects of short- term variations of salinity and temperature on the photosynthetic re- sponse of the red alga Grateloupia doryphora from Brittany, France. Botanica Marina 42: 437-440.sorte, c. J. b., s. l. wIllIAms & J. t. cArleton. 2010. Marine range shifts and species introductions: comparative spread rates and commu- nity impacts. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 303-316.soutH, G. r. 1968. Observations on the occurrence of a species of Lomen­ taria in southern British Columbia and northern Washington. Cana­ dian Journal of Botany 46: 727-732.stAcHowIcz, J. J., J. r. terwIn, r. b. wHItlAtcH & r. w. osmAn. 2002. Linking climate change and biological invasions: Ocean warming facilitates non-indigenous species invasions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 15497-15500.sKottsberG, c. 1921. Marine algae. I Phaeophyceae. In: Botanische Ergerbnisse der schwedischen Expedition nach Patagonien und dem Feuerlande 1907-1909. VIII. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskap sakad­ emiens Handl 61: 1-56.stewArt, J. G. 1991. Marine algae and seagrasses of San Diego County. California Sea Grant College, University of California, La Jolla, CA. Report No. T-CSGCP-020. 197 p.tHomsen, m. s., c. F. d. GurGel, s. FrederIcq & K. J. mcGlAtHerY. 2006. Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta, Gracilariales) in Hog Island Bay, Virginia: a cryptic alien and invasive macroalga and taxonomic correction. Journal of Phycology 42: 139-141.tHomsen, m. s., P. stæHr, c. nYberG, d. KrAuse-Jensen, s. scHwærter & b. sIllImAn. 2007. Gracilaria vermiculophylla in northern Europe, with focus on Denmark, and what to expect in the future. Aquatic Inva­ sions 2: 83-94.tHornber, c., b. KInlAn, m. GrAHAm & J. stAcHowIcz. 2004. Recruitment, survivorship, and thermal tolerances of populations of the invasive kelp Undaria pinnatifida in California. Marine Ecology Progress Se­ ries 268: 69-80.trowbrIdGe, c. d. 1995. Establishment of the green alga Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides on New Zealand rocky shores: current distribu- tion and invertebrate grazers. Journal of Ecology 83: 949-965.trowbrIdGe, c. d. 1998. Ecology of the green macroalga Codium frag- ile (Suringar) Hariot 1889: invasive and non-invasive subspecies. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 36: 1-64.uwAI, s., w. nelson, K. neIll, w. d. wAnG, l. e. AGuIlAr-rosAs, s. m. boo,t. KItAYAmA & H. KAwAI. 2006. Genetic diversity in Undaria pinnatifida(Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) deduced from mitochondria genes- origins and succession of introduced populations. Phycologia 45: 687-695.VerlAque, m. 2001. Checklist of the macroalgae of Thau Lagoon (Hérault, France), a hot spot of marine species introduction in Europe. Ocean­ ologica Acta 24: 29-49.VerlAque, m. 2002. Morphology and reproduction of Dasya sessilis (Ce- ramiales, Rhodophyta) - an introduced Asiatic species thriving in Thau Lagoon (France, Mediterranean Sea). Phycologia 41: 612-618.VerlAque, m., t. belsHer & J. m. delous-PAolI. 2002. Morphology and re- production of Asiatic Ulva pertusa (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in ThauLagoon (France, Mediterranean Sea). Cryptogamie Algologie 23: 301-310.VerlAque, m., P. m. brAnnocK, t. KomAtsu, m. VIllAlArd-boHnsAcK & m. mArston. 2005. The genus Grateloupia C. Agardh (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) in the Thau Lagoon (France, Mediterranean): a case study of marine plurispecific introductions. Phycologia 44: 477-496.VIllAlArd-boHnsAcK, m. & m. m. HArlIn. 1997. The appearance of Gra­ teloupia doryphora (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) on the northeast coast of North America. Phycologia 36: 324-328.VoIsIn, m., c. r. enGel & F. VIArd. 2005. Differential shuffling of native ge- netic diversity across introduced regions in a brown alga: Aquacul- ture vs. maritime traffic effects. Proceedings of the National Acad­ emy of Sciences 102: 5432-5437.wAsson, K., c. J. zAbIn, l. bedInGer, c. m. dIAz & J. s. PeArse. 2001. Biological invasions of estuaries without international shipping: the importance of intraregional transport. Biological Conservation 102: 143-153.wAsson, K., K. Fenn & J. s. PeArse. 2005. Habitat differences in marine invasions of central California. Biological Invasions 7: 935-948.wIllIAms, s. l. & e. d. GrosHolz. 2002. Preliminary reports from the Cauler­ pa taxifolia invasion in southern California. Marine Ecology Progress Series 233: 307-310.wIllIAms, s. l. & s. l. scHroeder. 2004. Eradication of the invasive sea- weed Caulerpa taxifolia by chlorine bleach. Marine Ecology Prog­ ress Series 272: 69-76.wIllIAms, s. l. & J. e. smItH. 2007. A global review of the distribution, taxonomy, and impacts of introduced seaweeds. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38: 327-359.wIlson, m. 2001. Is Sargassum muticum a benign invader of tidepools on the Pacific coast of North America? M.S. Thesis, California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside. 50 p.womersleY, H. b. s. 1987. The marine benthic flora of Southern Australia. Part II. Southern Australian Government Printing Division, Adelaide. 484 p.wonHAm, m. & l. PAcHePsKY. 2006. A null model of temporal trends in bio- logical invasion records. Ecology Letters 9: 663-672.YounG, d. n. 1981. Taxonomic observations on eastern Pacific Anti­ thamnion species (Rhodophyta: Ceramiaceae) described by E.Y. Dawson. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 94: 94-100.zAbIn, c. J., G. V. AsHton, c. w. brown & G. m. ruIz. 2009. Northern range expansion of the Asian kelp Undaria pinnatifida (Harvey) Suringar (Laminariales, Phaeophyceae) in western North America. Aquatic Invasions 3: 429-434.zAlesKI, s. F. & s. n. murrAY. 2006. Taxonomic diversity and geographic distributions of aquarium-traded species of Caulerpa (Chlorophyta: Caulerpaceae) in southern California, USA. Marine Ecology Prog­ ress Series 314: 97-108.zemKe-wHIte, w. l. & m. oHno. 1999. World seaweed utilisation: An end- of-century summary. Journal of Applied Phycology 11: 369-376.zuccArello, G. c., J. A. west & J. rueness. 2002. Phylogeography of the cosmopolitan red alga Caulacanthus ustulatus (Caulacanthaceae, Gigartinales). Phycological Research 50: 163-172.Recibido: 27 mayo de 2011.Aceptado: 29 de agosto de 2011.